Motivational interviewing for students in school settings: A meta-analysis.
Autor: | Gersib JA; Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, D5300 SZB 5.048H, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: jenna.gersib@utexas.edu., Rojo M; Department of Educational Psychology, University of North Texas, 1300 West Highland St., Denton, TX 76201, USA. Electronic address: megan.rojo@unt.edu., King SG; Department of Special Education, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 1776 University Ave., Wist Hall 116, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. Electronic address: sgking@hawaii.edu., Doabler CT; Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, D5300 SZB 5.048H, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: cdoabler@austin.utexas.edu. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of school psychology [J Sch Psychol] 2024 Dec; Vol. 107, pp. 101386. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 25. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101386 |
Abstrakt: | Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (g = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [-0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There is no conflict of interest to disclose. (Copyright © 2024 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |