The role of social justice in triage revisited: a threshold conception.
Autor: | Holzer F; Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zuerich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, Zuerich, 8006, Switzerland. felicitas.holzer@ibme.uzh.ch.; Zuerich, Switzerland. felicitas.holzer@ibme.uzh.ch., Biller-Andorno N; Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zuerich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, Zuerich, 8006, Switzerland., Baumann H; Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zuerich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, Zuerich, 8006, Switzerland. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Medicine, health care, and philosophy [Med Health Care Philos] 2024 Nov 23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 23. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11019-024-10232-9 |
Abstrakt: | Saving as many lives as possible while ensuring equity for vulnerable groups through access to triage resources has been the dominant position since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. However, the exact relationship between the principles of social justice and efficiency remains a controversial and unresolved issue. In this paper, we aim to systematically distinguish between different models of this relationship and show that conceptualizing social justice as a 'moral side-constraint' or adopting a 'balancing approach' that attempt to reconcile social justice with efficiency inevitably lead to significant moral costs that require further justification. Based on this discussion, we propose a novel "threshold model" for trading-off moral costs. According to this model, the structural impact of triage must be considered in order to determine whether one opts for triage with the primary aim of efficiency or social justice. This contextualization further explains why, in some societies and circumstances, social justice can rightly be seen as the primary concern, while in other societies and circumstances, efficiency can be defended as the primary concern. Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: None. Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |