Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups.

Autor: Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Degen G, Engel KH, Fowler P, Frutos Fernandez MJ, Fürst P, Gürtler R, Husøy T, Manco M, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Passamonti S, Shah R, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Wright M, Andreoli C, Bastos M, Benford D, Bignami M, Bolognesi C, Cheyns K, Corsini E, Crebelli R, Dusemund B, Fitzgerald R, Gaffet E, Loeschner K, Marcon F, Mast J, Mirat M, Mortensen A, Oomen A, Schlatter J, Turck D, Ulbrich B, Undas A, Vleminckx C, Woelfle D, Woutersen R, Barmaz S, Dino B, Gagliardi G, Levorato S, Mazzoli E, Nathanail A, Rincon AM, Ruggeri L, Smeraldi C, Tard A, Vermeiren S, Gundert-Remy U
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority [EFSA J] 2024 Oct 17; Vol. 22 (10), pp. e8880. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 17 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880
Abstrakt: The present opinion is the follow-up of the conclusions and recommendations of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive relevant to the safety assessment for all age groups. In addition, the risk assessment of silicon dioxide (E 551) for its use in food for infants below 16 weeks of age is performed. Based on the newly available information on the characterisation of the SAS used as E 551 and following the principles of the 2021 EFSA Guidance on Particle-TR, the conventional safety assessment has been complemented with nano-specific considerations. Given the uncertainties resulting from the limitations of the database and in the absence of genotoxicity concern, the Panel considered that it is not appropriate to derive an acceptable daily intake (ADI) but applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that the MOE should be at least 36 for not raising a safety concern. The calculated MOEs considering the dietary exposure estimates for all population groups using the refined non-brand loyal scenario, estimated at the time of the 2018 re-evaluation, were all above 36. The Panel concluded that E 551 does not raise a safety concern in all population groups at the reported uses and use levels. The use of E 551 in food for infants below 16 weeks of age in FC 13.1.1 and FC 13.1.5.1 does not raise a safety concern at the current exposure levels. The Panel also concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for E 551 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The paucity of toxicological studies with proper dispersion protocol (with the exception of the genotoxicity studies) creates uncertainty in the present assessment of the potential toxicological effects related to the exposure to E 551 nanosize aggregates.
Competing Interests: If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.
(© 2024 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
Databáze: MEDLINE