| Autor: |
Yuan J; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China., Lai Y; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China., Huang L; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China., Huang CT; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China., Tang FK; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China., Yang YM; Department of Toxicology, Hunan Provincial Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha 410007, China. |
| Jazyk: |
čínština |
| Zdroj: |
Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases [Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi] 2024 Sep 20; Vol. 42 (9), pp. 679-683. |
| DOI: |
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230707-00236 |
| Abstrakt: |
Objective: To explore the expert opinions on the revision of the Diagnosis of Occupational Arsenic Poisoning (GBZ 83-2013) . Methods: In March 2023, the improved Delphi expert consultation method was adopted, in the first round of consultation, a pre-survey was conducted on 20 experts, and the questionnaire was improved according to the experts' opinions. Then, a second round of expert consultation questionnaire was formed to conduct a questionnaire survey and consultation of 50 experts engaged in occupational disease diagnosis and related work. The feedback of experts was collected and analyzed. Results: The average score for the scientificity and progressiveness of the main technical content of the original standard was 3.33, and the average score for the rationality and operability of the main technical content of the original standard was 3.25. The importance of individual indicators with specific connotations were ranged from 4.20 to 4.45, with coefficients of variation <0.25, and the experts' opinions were relatively concentrated. The experts have provided feedback indicating that the original standard had issues such as lack of continuity in diagnostic gradation, the need to integrate biomarkers with urinary and hair arsenic levels, a scarcity of objective diagnostic indicators, the removal of exposure response from the main text, and a low level of consistency in standard usage. These issues need to be revised urgently. Conclusion: The Diagnosis of Occupational Arsenic Poisoning (GBZ 83-2013) should be revised based on experts' feedback and suggestions to meet the current real demand for occupational arsenic poisoning diagnosis. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
