Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot.

Autor: MacKechnie-Guire R; Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK., Murray R; Rossdales Veterinary Surgeons, Suffolk, UK., Williams JM; Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK., Nixon J; Buckingham Equine Vets, Buckingham, UK., Fisher M; Woolcroft Equine Services, Wisbech, UK., Fisher D; Woolcroft Equine Services, Wisbech, UK., Walker V; Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK., Clayton HM; Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Equine veterinary journal [Equine Vet J] 2024 Sep 21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 21.
DOI: 10.1111/evj.14420
Abstrakt: Background: Poor noseband adjustment could create high pressures that may risk pain or tissue damage.
Objectives: To quantify sub-noseband pressures dorsally over the nasal bone and ventrally over the mandibular rami for a Cavesson, Swedish (crank), Drop and Flash noseband at five tightness levels (2.0 to 0.0 finger equivalents).
Study Design: In vivo experiments.
Methods: Eight high-level dressage horses were ridden at the trot in a straight line by their usual riders. Two small pressure mats, attached to the noseband over the nasal bone and the mandibular rami, collected force (N) and pressure (kPa) data from four noseband types (Cavesson/Swedish/Flash/Drop) each adjusted to five tightness levels (2.0/1.5/1.0/0.5/0.0 finger equivalents) based on the use of a taper gauge. Noseband tightness and types were compared using Friedman's analyses with post hoc Wilcoxon tests (p ≤ 0.01).
Results: Pressures (median and [25th and 75th percentiles]) and forces increased with tightness for all noseband types with higher mean pressures consistently recorded on the mandibles (Cavesson: 9.1 [5.0, 12.5] kPa, Swedish: 10.5 [6.3, 14.9] kPa, Flash: 8.0 [3.6, 15.2] kPa) than the nasal bones (Cavesson: 2.8 [1.1, 4.7] kPa, Swedish: 4.3 [3.1, 7.4] kPa, Flash: 4.9 [3.0, 7.3] kPa, p ≤ 0.002). None of the measured nasal pressures or forces differed significantly between tightness levels of 2.0 (1.6 [0.6, 3.6] kPa) and 1.5 fingers (2.9 [1.3, 4.1] kPa), but these values significantly increased from 1.0 (3.1 [1.5, 4.9] kPa), 0.5 (4.2 [2.3, 6.2] kPa), and 0.0 finger tightness (6.4 [3.8, 10.3] kPa) for most variables (p ≤ 0.004). No differences were found in mean/maximal nasal and mandibular pressures when fitted with a Cavesson or Swedish noseband.
Main Limitations: Behavioural and physiological parameters were not measured.
Conclusions: Nasal and mandibular pressures increased with noseband tightness, with 1.0 finger laxity or less associated with significantly and incrementally higher pressures than 1.5 or 2.0 finger tightness.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: