Community-Engaged Implementation Strategies in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.
| Autor: | Kang E; Eunyoung Kang, PhD, BOT, is Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; eunyoung.kang@uth.tmc.edu., Chen J; Julie Chen, BS, is Occupational Therapy Student, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO., Lipsey KL; Kim L. Lipsey, MLS, is Medical Librarian, Bernard Becker Medical Library, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO., Foster ER; Erin R. Foster, PhD, OTD, OTR/L, is Associate Professor, Program in Occupational Therapy, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association [Am J Occup Ther] 2024 Sep 01; Vol. 78 (5). |
| DOI: | 10.5014/ajot.2024.050526 |
| Abstrakt: | Importance: Despite the potential of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR) in developing strategies to accelerate the translation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), there is a noticeable knowledge gap in the current state of CEIR in occupational therapy. A synthesis of the concept, purpose, and operationalization of CEIR is necessary. Objective: To identify the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of CEIR, focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy. Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study Selection and Data Collection: We included studies that were explicit and intentional about CEIR and that focused on implementation strategies to support the translation of occupational therapy interventions, clinical guidelines, practice models, theories, or assessments. We extracted the research context (e.g., partners, recruitment), purpose (e.g., why community-engaged research was used), and operationalization (e.g., community engagement [CE] activities, how their findings inform the research) using thematic analysis. Findings: Of 3,219 records, 6 studies were included. Involved partners were mainly occupational therapy practitioners from existing networks. CEIR that focuses on implementation strategies informs various aspects of research design, ranging from study design to sustainability, by developing community-academia partnerships, building implementation capacity, and creating implementation strategies across diverse research areas. Current research has used various but mostly traditional CE activities (e.g., focus groups). Conclusions and Relevance: We synthesized evidence on CEIR focused on implementation strategies in occupational therapy. Intentional efforts are needed to collaborate with diverse partners, explore innovative CE activities, produce equitable outputs, and develop multilevel implementation strategies to accelerate the translation of EBIs into practice. Plain-Language Summary: In this review, we synthesize evidence on the contexts, purposes, and operationalization of community-engaged implementation research (CEIR), focusing on implementation strategies in occupational therapy research. We found that current implementation efforts mainly rely on occupational therapy practitioners as community partners and use traditional recruitment methods and community engagement activities. In turn, they develop implementation strategies that mainly target practitioners without comprehensive, multilevel implementation support. We suggest more equitable collaboration with diverse partners to effectively promote the implementation and dissemination of evidence-based interventions in occupational therapy practice. (Copyright © 2024 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|