A Comparative Evaluation of Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Alone in the Treatment of Periodontal Infrabony Defects: A Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Autor:	Goswami A; Department of Periodontics, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Center, Durg, IND., Lanjewar S; Department of Periodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, IND., Mangalekar S; Department of Periodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, IND., Dodwad V; Department of Periodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND., Oza R; Department of Periodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND., Vhanmane P; Department of Periodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, IND., Shirbhate U; Department of Periodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jun 06; Vol. 16 (6), pp. e61808. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 06 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.61808
Abstrakt:	Aim Allografts, autografts, alloplast and xenografts are frequently used for periodontal regeneration. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and DFDBA alone in periodontal infrabony defects. Methodology This was a split-mouth design study where 20 infrabony defects in 10 patients were included. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, where DFDBA allograft and A-PRF were used in the test group, while the DFDBA allograft alone was used in the control group. Furthermore, the results were evaluated at baseline, three, and nine months, respectively, in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters. Data were analysed with an unpaired t-test at the significance level of P < 0.05 (statistically significant). Results Both treatments showed reduced clinical and radiographic parameters from baseline to nine months. There was a non-significant difference in the plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), and radiographic defect fill (RDF). In comparison to the control group (3.40 ± 0.516), the probing pocket depth (PPD) in the test group at nine months (3.22 ± 0.422) was statistically significant showing reduction in the PPD (P = 0.042). Conclusion Within its limitations, the study showed that A-PRF plus DFDBA and DFDBA alone treatment modalities reduced clinical and radiographic parameters from baseline, at 9 months; however, the inclusion of A-PRF did not substantially improve the treatment outcome when comparing both the groups, except for the probing pocket depth after nine months. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee of Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College and Hospital, Sangli issued approval BV(DU)MC & H/Sangli/IEC/Dissertation 2018-19/D-06. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, Goswami et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu