General surgery educational resources for Jordanian medical students.
| Autor: | Nofal MN; Department of General Surgery and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan., Al Awayshish MM; Department of General Surgery and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan., Yousef AJ; Department of General Surgery and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan., Alamaren AM; Al Karak Governmental Hospital, Karak, Jordan., Al-Rabadi ZI; Al-Basheer Hospital, Amman, Jordan., Haddad DS; School of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan., Al-Rbaihat YA; School of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan., Al-Qusous YN; School of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Surgery open science [Surg Open Sci] 2024 May 29; Vol. 20, pp. 62-65. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 29 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.009 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: To outline the resources deemed most beneficial to medical students during their general surgery clerkship, as well as to examine their link to students' general surgery scores and the usage of artificial intelligence in general surgery study. Methods: A retrospective survey of Jordanian medical students from six universities was done between March and June 2023 using a 7-item questionnaire covering questions concerning general surgery study methods and scores. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic data. Chi-square is used to evaluate categorical data, with a P value <0.05 deemed significant. Results: The average age of respondents was 23.3 years, and 54.2 % of the respondents were females, 47.8 % were from Mutah University. Most students (48.2 %) relied on tutor lectures. Students who studied through instructor lectures had the highest grades (9 % excellent, 17 % very good), followed by students who studied using surgery textbooks (6.8 % and 14.6 %, respectively). The relationship between the study method and academic achievement was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Traditional face-to-face learning with instructor lectures and surgery textbooks is still the most efficient approach to attain the greatest scores. Medical students are still underutilizing artificial intelligence. Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest. (© 2024 The Authors.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|