Exploring individual responses to welfare issues in growing-finishing pig feeding behaviour.

Autor:	Bus JD; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: jacinta.bus@wur.nl., Boumans IJMM; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, the Netherlands., Te Beest DE; Biometris, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 16, 6700AA Wageningen, the Netherlands., Webb LE; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, the Netherlands., Bokkers EAM; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience [Animal] 2024 Jun; Vol. 18 (6), pp. 101192. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 17.
DOI:	10.1016/j.animal.2024.101192
Abstrakt:	The feeding behaviour of individual growing-finishing pigs can be continuously monitored using sensors such as electronic feeding stations (EFSs), and this could be further used to monitor pig welfare. To make accurate conclusions about individual pig welfare, however, it is important to know whether deviations in feeding behaviour in response to welfare issues are shown only on average or by each individual pig. Therefore, this study aimed (1) to quantify the individual variation in feeding behaviour changes in response to a range of welfare issues, and (2) to explain this individual variation by quantifying the responses to welfare issues for specific subgroups of pigs. We monitored four rounds of 110 growing-finishing pigs each (3-4 months per round). We collected feeding behaviour data using IVOG® EFSs and identified health issues and heat stress using climate sensors and twice-weekly health observations. For each pig, a generalised additive model was fitted, which modelled feeding behaviour through time and estimated the effect of each welfare issue that the pig had suffered from. The range of these effect estimates was compared between pigs to study the individual variation in responses. Subsequently, pigs were repeatedly grouped using physical and feeding characteristics, and, with meta-subset analysis, it was determined for each group whether a deviation in response to the welfare issue (i.e. their combined effect estimates) was present. We found that the range in effect estimates was very large, approaching normal distributions for most combinations of welfare issues and feeding variables. This indicates that most pigs did not show feeding behaviour deviations during the welfare issue, while those that did could show both increases and reductions. One exception was heat stress, for which almost all pigs showed reductions in their feed intake, feeding duration and feeding frequency. When looking at subgroups of pigs, it was seen that especially for lameness and tail damage pigs with certain physical characteristics or feeding strategies did consistently deviate on some feeding components during welfare issues (e.g. only relatively heavier pigs reduced their feeding frequency during lameness). In conclusion, while detection of individual pigs suffering from heat stress using feeding variables should be feasible, detection of (mild) health issues would be difficult due to pigs responding differently, if at all, to a given health issue. For some pigs with specific physical or behavioural characteristics, nevertheless, detection of some health issues, such as lameness or tail damage, may be possible. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu