Long COVID Definitions and Models of Care : A Scoping Review.
Autor: | Chou R; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.)., Herman E; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (E.H.)., Ahmed A; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.)., Anderson J; Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (J.A.)., Selph S; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.)., Dana T; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.)., Williams L; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.)., Ivlev I; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.). |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Annals of internal medicine [Ann Intern Med] 2024 Jul; Vol. 177 (7), pp. 929-940. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 21. |
DOI: | 10.7326/M24-0677 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Definitions of long COVID are evolving, and optimal models of care are uncertain. Purpose: To perform a scoping review on definitions of long COVID and provide an overview of care models, including a proposed framework to describe and distinguish models. Data Sources: English-language articles from Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, SocINDEX, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL published between January 2021 and November 2023; gray literature; and discussions with 18 key informants. Study Selection: Publications describing long COVID definitions or models of care, supplemented by models described by key informants. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified for accuracy by another reviewer. Data Synthesis: Of 1960 screened citations, 38 were included. Five clinical definitions of long COVID varied with regard to timing since symptom onset and the minimum duration required for diagnosis; 1 additional definition was symptom score-based. Forty-nine long COVID care models were informed by 5 key principles: a core "lead" team, multidisciplinary expertise, comprehensive access to diagnostic and therapeutic services, a patient-centered approach, and providing capacity to meet demand. Seven characteristics provided a framework for distinguishing models: home department or clinical setting, clinical lead, collocation of other specialties, primary care role, population managed, use of teleservices, and whether the model was practice- or systems-based. Using this framework, 10 representative practice-based and 3 systems-based models of care were identified. Limitations: Published literature often lacked key model details, data were insufficient to assess model outcomes, and there was overlap between and variability within models. Conclusion: Definitions of long COVID and care models are evolving. Research is needed to optimize models and evaluate outcomes of different models. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol posted at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/long-covid-models-care/protocol.). Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M24-0677. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |