Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology.

Autor:	de Oliveira APC; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil., Mion ABZ; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil., Batista HFB; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Galante ML; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil., Duré MI; Pan American Health Organization Buenos Aires Argentina Pan American Health Organization, Buenos Aires, Argentina., Craveiro I; Global Health and Tropical Medicine Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal., Mishima SM; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil., Padilla M; Pan American Health Organization Brasilia Brazil Pan American Health Organization, Brasilia, Brazil., Laus AM; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil., Ventura CAA; Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health [Rev Panam Salud Publica] 2024 May 02; Vol. 48, pp. e39. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 02 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.26633/RPSP.2024.39
Abstrakt:	Objective: To create and validate criteria for prioritizing problems related to policies and management of the health workforce. Methods: This methodological study was divided into three stages. First, the criteria were elaborated by means of a systematized literature review. Second, the criteria were evaluated online by a committee of judges comprised of eight specialists. In the third stage, an evaluation was carried out by the target audience in a hybrid workshop. The participants evaluated the material using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument, adapted for the research. Results: Three prioritization criteria (relevance, window of opportunity and acceptability) and a scoring scale were developed based on the literature review. In the evaluation by the committee of judges, the approval percentage of the criteria and prioritization method was 84%. Modifications were made based on suggestions in relation to the material presented to the specialists. In the pre-test stage, the approval percentage varied by item, with six of them reaching a maximum approval of 100% (corresponding to approximately 46% of the items), four reaching 92% and three achieving 83% each, indicating positive results. Conclusions: The developed criteria were considered valid for use in the context of policies and management in the area of human resources for health. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest. None declared.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu