Embryo long-term storage does not affect assisted reproductive technologies outcome: analysis of 58,001 vitrified blastocysts over 11 years.

Autor: Cobo A; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: ana.cobo@ivirma.com., Coello A; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain., De Los Santos MJ; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain., Remohi J; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain., Bellver J; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 231 (2), pp. 238.e1-238.e11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 26.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.033
Abstrakt: Background: Recently, the potential detrimental effect that the duration of storage time may have on vitrified samples has raised some concerns, especially when some studies found an association between cryostorage length and decreased clinical results.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the storage time length of day-5 vitrified blastocysts in 2 study groups: freeze-all cycles and nonelective frozen embryo transfers.
Study Design: This was a retrospective study that included 58,001 vitrified/warmed day-5 blastocysts from 2 different populations, according to the reason for frozen embryo transfer. Elective frozen embryo transfer comprised freeze-all cycles (N=16,615 blastocysts and 16,615 patients) in which only single embryo transfers and only the first frozen embryo transfer were included. The nonelective frozen embryo transfer group included 41,386 embryos from 25,571 patients where frozen embryo transfer took place using supernumerary embryos after fresh embryo transfer. All the possible frozen embryo transfers were included. Both single embryo transfer and double embryo transfers were included. Donor and autologous oocytes were used. The period covered by this study was 11 years. The blastocyst sample was clustered into deciles, which provided specific storage duration categories. The main outcome was the live birth rate, and secondary outcomes were embryo survival, miscarriage, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates according to storage duration. The impact of storage time was assessed by univariable analyses in both groups. The comparison was made between each decile and the last one. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, including the variables with significant association found in the univariate analysis. Student t test and chi-square tests, or an analysis of variance, were used wherever appropriate. P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: There were statistical differences in baseline characteristics of patients included in the study groups. Storage durations ranged from ≤0.67 to ≥4.34 and from ≤1.8 to ≥34.81 months in freeze-all and nonelective frozen embryo transfer, respectively. Embryo survival did not show statistical differences across the categories of storage time in freeze-all and nonelective frozen embryo transfer groups. Statistical differences were found for the live birth rate across some, but not all, the subgroups of storage duration. The multivariable analysis showed no association between storage time and the live birth rate in both groups (nonsignificant). Blastocyst quality, body mass index, number of retrieved oocytes, endometrial preparation, male factor, and uterine factor were related to the drop in the live birth rate in the freeze-all group (P<.05). In the nonelective frozen embryo transfer group, the variables that showed significant association with the live birth rate were age at retrieval and frozen embryo transfer, type of frozen embryo transfer (single embryo transfer or double embryo transfers), number of retrieved oocytes, body mass index, endometrial preparation, origin of sperm sample, and female factor.
Conclusion: This large study demonstrated no association between storage time and clinical outcome. Other variables, such as the patient's age, embryo quality, body mass index, and etiology, are somewhat responsible for impacting the outcome. This provides evidence for the safety of embryo vitrification, even after long storage periods. This is reassuring for both in vitro fertilization practitioners and patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer of either elective or nonelective embryos.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: