Evaluating growth patterns of abdominal aortic aneurysms among women.

Autor:	DiLosa K; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: kldilosa@ucdavis.edu., Brittenham G; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA., Pozolo C; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA., Hedayati N; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA., Kwong M; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA., Maximus S; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA., Humphries M; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2024 Jul; Vol. 80 (1), pp. 107-113. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 12.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.042
Abstrakt:	Objective: Though initially protected from vessel dilation by estrogen, women may experience rapid abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth post-menopause. The rate of growth has been poorly defined in prior literature. Here, we describe aneurysm growth in a cohort of women found through an AAA screening program. Methods: Women with AAAs were retrospectively identified. Aortic imaging was reviewed, and measurements of maximum transverse and anterior-posterior diameters were completed. Growth was stratified by the type of aortic pathology (fusiform aneurysm, aortic ectasia, dissection with aneurysmal degeneration, saccular aneurysm) as well as size category (<3 cm, 3.0-3.9 cm, 4.0-4.9 cm, ≥5.0 cm) at diagnosis. Results: A cohort of 488 women was identified; 286 had multiple scans for review. The mean age of the entire cohort was 75 ± 9.9 years. Stratified by type of pathology, the mean age was 76 ± 8.9 years in patients with a fusiform AAA, 74 ± 9.8 years in ectasia, 65 ± 13.7 years in dissection, and 76 ± 5.6 years in saccular aneurysms. The maximum growth was highest in women with fusiform AAAs, followed by dissection, ectasia, and saccular pathology (9.7 mm, 7.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 2.2 mm, respectively; P < .001). Comparing mean growth by year, the highest mean growth was in fusiform AAAs (3.6 mm vs 1.75 mm in dissection; P < .001). The Shapiro-Wilk test demonstrated that mean growth per year was non-normally distributed with a right skew. Stratified by aortic diameter at the time of diagnosis, mean growth/year increased with increasing size at diagnosis in fusiform AAAs and dissection (0.91 mm for <3 cm, 2.34 mm for 3.0-3.9 cm, 2.49 mm for 4.0-4.9 mm, and 6.16 mm for ≥5.0 cm in patients with fusiform AAAs vs 0.57 mm, 0.94 mm, 1.87 mm, and 2.66 mm, respectively, for patients with dissection). Smoking history was associated with a higher mean growth/year (2.6 mm vs 3.3 mm; P < .001). Conversely, patients with a family history of AAA had a lower mean growth/year (3.2 mm vs 1.5 mm; P < .001). Conclusions: The rate of aneurysm growth in women varies based on pathology and aneurysm size, and women experience rapid aneurysm growth at sizes greater than 4.5 cm. Current screening guidelines are inadequate, and our results demonstrate that the rate of growth of fusiform aneurysms in women is faster than in men at a smaller size and may warrant more frequent surveillance than current Society for Vascular Surgery recommendations to prevent risk of increased morbidity. Competing Interests: Disclosures None. (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu