Mentorship Interest in Breast Imaging: Survey Results From the Society of Breast Imaging.

Autor:	Weinfurtner RJ; Moffitt Cancer Center, Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Tampa, FL, USA., Lee A; University of California, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA, USA., Vincenti K; Medical Imaging of Lehigh Valley, Diagnostic Radiology, Allentown, PA, USA., Gundry K; Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Atlanta, GA, USA., Hoyt T; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Clinical Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA., Klein K; University of Michigan, Department of Radiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Merkulov A; University of Connecticut Health, Department of Radiology, Farmington, CT, USA., Mullen L; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA., O'Brien S; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Roubein D; HSHS St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Decatur, IL, USA., Tseng J; Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, CA, USA., Margolies L; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of breast imaging [J Breast Imaging] 2022 Apr 15; Vol. 4 (2), pp. 161-167.
DOI:	10.1093/jbi/wbab100
Abstrakt:	Objective: This study assessed mentorship interest within the breast radiologist community to guide development of a mentorship program through the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI). Methods: A 19-question survey developed by the SBI mentorship committee was distributed electronically to its members March 16, 2021, to May 7, 2021, to gauge interest in forming a society-sponsored mentorship program. Responses were analyzed, with subgroups compared using chi-square analysis. Results: There was an 18% response rate (598/3277), and 65% (381/588) professed interest in an SBI-sponsored mentorship. Respondents were evenly distributed between academic (241/586, 41%) and private practice (242/586, 41%). Most were breast imaging fellowship-trained (355/593, 60%) and identified as female (420/596, 70%). For practice years, 50% (293/586) were late career (11+ years) with the remainder early-mid career (201/586, 34%) or trainees (92/586, 16%). For mentorship content areas, work/life balance was the most popular choice (275/395, 70%) followed by leadership (234/395, 59%). Most respondents were not currently mentors (279/377, 74%) or mentees (284/337, 84%). Those interested in a mentorship relationship were statistically younger (<45 years old, 234/381, 61% vs 31/207, 15%, P < 0.00001), female (289/381, 76% vs 123/207, 59%, P = 0.00003), academics (189/381, 50% vs 48/207, 23%, P < 0.00001), identified as a racial/ethnic minority (138/381, 64% vs 121/297, 15%, P < 0.00001), and fellowship-trained (262/381, 69% vs 88/207, 43%, P < 0.00001). Conclusion: There is demand, especially among the society's young and minority members, for an SBI-sponsored mentorship program. Work/life balance and leadership were the most popular choices for guidance. (© Society of Breast Imaging 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu