Vision screening using the Acuidrive device.

Autor: Atchison DA; Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia., Lal B; Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia., Schmid KL; Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia., Romeo B; Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia., Carkeet A; Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical & experimental optometry [Clin Exp Optom] 2024 Aug; Vol. 107 (6), pp. 635-640. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 13.
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2255867
Abstrakt: Clinical Relevance: Understanding devices used for vision screening, including their potential utilisation and validity, will facilitate proper utilisation of this technology.
Background: The Acuidrive is a self-illuminated, hand-held, visual acuity screening device intended for use in policing, with visual acuity assessed roadside to identify drivers who may not meet vision standards for driving. The target is presented binocularly at 24 cm, and +4.00 D lenses eliminate the accommodation requirement. This study investigates its validity and applicability relative to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Methods: There were 36 participants, half younger adults aged 18-30 years and half older adults aged 50-70 years. The subjects underwent binocular visual acuity testing using the Acuidrive device and an ETDRS chart displayed on a monitor. Eyes were corrected for distance using lenses in a trial frame, and additional trial lenses provided four blur levels: zero, +0.50 DS, +1.00 DS and +1.50 DS. Luminances for the devices were similar at approximately 100 cd/m 2 . ETDRS chart measurements were conducted both with room lighting on and off.
Results: The Acuidrive device underestimated the ETDRS visual acuity across all blur levels, with mean differences of 0.24 ± 0.07 logMAR and 0.18 ± 0.10 logMAR for room lights on and off, respectively. To predict ETDRS visual acuity of poorer than 0.34 logMAR (6/12 = ), a screening level of 0.50 logMAR (6/19) with the Acuidrive device provided high sensitivity and specificity (86% and 79% with lights-on, and 85% and 78% with lights-off). Visual acuity was better for the older group than the younger group by approximately 0.10 logMAR.
Conclusion: There was an offset of 0.2 logMAR (two lines) between visual acuity measures for the Acuidrive device and an ETDRS chart. The Acuidrive device has the potential to be a viable screening tool with refinement to its construction.
Databáze: MEDLINE