Roles of the Red List of Ecosystems in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Autor: Nicholson E; School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. emily.nicholson@unimelb.edu.au.; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. emily.nicholson@unimelb.edu.au.; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland. emily.nicholson@unimelb.edu.au., Andrade A; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.; Conservation International Colombia, Bogota, Colombia., Brooks TM; IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.; World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.; Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia., Driver A; Independent consultant, Cape Town, South Africa., Ferrer-Paris JR; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.; Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; UNSW Data Science Hub, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Grantham H; Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Bush Heritage, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Gudka M; School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; CORDIO East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya., Keith DA; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.; Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Kontula T; Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland., Lindgaard A; Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (Artsdatabanken), Trondheim, Norway., Londono-Murcia MC; Alexander von Humboldt Institute Colombia, Bogotá, South Africa., Murray N; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia., Raunio A; Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland., Rowland JA; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland., Sievers M; Coastal and Marine Research Centre, Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia., Skowno AL; South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.; Department of Biological Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa., Stevenson SL; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Valderrabano M; IUCN, Gland, Switzerland., Vernon CM; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Zager I; IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.; Provita, Caracas, Venezuela., Obura D; CORDIO East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Nature ecology & evolution [Nat Ecol Evol] 2024 Apr; Vol. 8 (4), pp. 614-621. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 08.
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02320-5
Abstrakt: The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity set the agenda for global aspirations and action to reverse biodiversity loss. The GBF includes an explicit goal for maintaining and restoring biodiversity, encompassing ecosystems, species and genetic diversity (goal A), targets for ecosystem protection and restoration and headline indicators to track progress and guide action 1 . One of the headline indicators is the Red List of Ecosystems 2 , the global standard for ecosystem risk assessment. The Red List of Ecosystems provides a systematic framework for collating, analysing and synthesizing data on ecosystems, including their distribution, integrity and risk of collapse 3 . Here, we examine how it can contribute to implementing the GBF, as well as monitoring progress. We find that the Red List of Ecosystems provides common theory and practical data, while fostering collaboration, cross-sector cooperation and knowledge sharing, with important roles in 16 of the 23 targets. In particular, ecosystem maps, descriptions and risk categories are key to spatial planning for halting loss, restoration and protection (targets 1, 2 and 3). The Red List of Ecosystems is therefore well-placed to aid Parties to the GBF as they assess, plan and act to achieve the targets and goals. We outline future work to further strengthen this potential and improve biodiversity outcomes, including expanding spatial coverage of Red List of Ecosystems assessments and partnerships between practitioners, policy-makers and scientists.
(© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: