Quality assurance of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery among patients in the BOOG 2013-08 trial.
Autor: | Wintraecken VM; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: veerle.wintraecken@mumc.nl., Boersma LJ; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands., van Roozendaal LM; Department of Surgical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands., de Vries J; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands; Board member Adrz, Goes, the Netherlands., van Kuijk SMJ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Vane MLG; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands., van Dalen T; Division of Surgical Oncology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands., van der Hage JA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Leids University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Strobbe LJA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Linn SC; Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Lobbes MBI; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands., Poortmans PMP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium., Tjan-Heijnen VCG; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands., van de Vijver KKBT; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Westenberg AH; Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapiegroep location Arnhem, Arnhem, the Netherlands., de Wilt JHW; Division of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Smidt ML; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Simons JM; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2024 Feb; Vol. 191, pp. 110069. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 21. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110069 |
Abstrakt: | Background and Purpose: In the BOOG 2013-08 trial (NCT02271828), cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients were randomized between breast conserving surgery with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) followed by whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). While awaiting primary endpoint results (axillary recurrence rate), this study aims to perform a quality assurance analysis on protocol adherence and (incidental) axillary radiation therapy (RT) dose. Materials and Methods: Patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2022. Data on prescribed RT and (in 25% of included patients) planning target volumes (PTV) parameters were recorded for axillary levels I-IV and compared between treatment arms. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic variables for incidental axillary RT dose. Results: 1,439/1,461 included patients (98.5%) were treated according to protocol and 87 patients (5.9%) received regional RT (SLNB 10.9%, no-SLNB 1.5 %). In 326 patients included in the subgroup analysis, the mean incidental PTV dose at axilla level I was 59.5% of the prescribed breast RT dose. In 5 patients (1.5%) the mean PTV dose at level I was ≥95% of the prescribed breast dose. No statistically or clinically significant differences regarding incidental axillary RT dose were found between treatment arms. Tumour bed boost (yes/no) was associated with a higher incidental mean dose in level I (R 2 = 0.035, F(6, 263) = 1.532, p 0.168). Conclusion: The results indicate that RT-protocol adherence was high, and that incidental axillary RT dose was low in the BOOG 2013-08 trial. Potential differences between treatmentarms regarding the primary endpoint can thus not be attributed to different axillary radiation doses. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |