Implementation of a Sensitive Method to Assess High Virus Retention Performance of Low-Pressure Reverse Osmosis Process.

Autor: Taligrot H; CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, Équipe Procédés Membranaires (EPM), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.; Eau de Paris, Direction de la Recherche du Développement et de la Qualité de l'Eau, 33 Avenue Jean Jaurès, 94200, Ivry-Sur-Seine, France., Wurtzer S; Eau de Paris, Direction de la Recherche du Développement et de la Qualité de l'Eau, 33 Avenue Jean Jaurès, 94200, Ivry-Sur-Seine, France., Monnot M; CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, Équipe Procédés Membranaires (EPM), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France., Moulin L; Eau de Paris, Direction de la Recherche du Développement et de la Qualité de l'Eau, 33 Avenue Jean Jaurès, 94200, Ivry-Sur-Seine, France., Moulin P; CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, Équipe Procédés Membranaires (EPM), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France. philippe.moulin@univ-amu.fr.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Food and environmental virology [Food Environ Virol] 2024 Mar; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 97-108. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 12.
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-023-09570-3
Abstrakt: Human enteric viruses are important etiological agents of waterborne diseases. Environmental waters are usually contaminated with low virus concentration requiring large concentration factors for effective detection by (RT)-qPCR. Low-pressure reverse osmosis is often used to remove water contaminants, but very few studies focused on the effective virus removal of reverse osmosis treatment with feed concentrations as close as possible to environmental concentrations and principally relied on theoretical virus removal. The very low viral concentrations usually reported in the permeates (i.e. at least 5 log of removal rate) mean that very large volumes of water need to be analysed to have sufficient sensitivity and assess the process efficiency. This study evaluates two methods for the concentration of adenoviruses, enteroviruses and MS2 bacteriophages at different viral concentrations in large (< 200 L) and very large (> 200 L) volumes. The first method is composed of two ultrafiltration membranes with low-molecular weight cut-offs while the second method primarily relies on adsorption and elution phases using electropositive-charged filters. The recovery rates were assessed for both methods. For the ultrafiltration-based protocol, recovery rates were similar for each virus studied: 80% on average at high virus concentrations (10 6 -10 7 viruses L -1 ) and 50% at low virus concentrations (10 3 -10 4 viruses L -1 ). For the electropositive-charged filter-based method, the average recoveries obtained were about 36% for ADV 41, 57% for CV-B5 and 1.6% for MS2. The ultrafiltration-based method was then used to evaluate the performance of a low-pressure reverse osmosis lab-scale pilot plant. The retentions by reverse osmosis were similar for all studied viruses and the validated recovery rates applied to the system confirmed the reliability of the concentration method. This method was effective in concentrating all three viruses over a wide range of viral concentrations. Moreover, the second concentration method using electropositive-charged filters was studied, allowing the filtration of larger volumes of permeate from a semi-industrial low-pressure reverse osmosis pilot plant. This reference method was used because of the inability of the UF method to filter volumes on the order of one cubic metre.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: