| Autor: |
Soletti GJ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Dimagli A; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Harik L; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Cancelli G; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Perezgrovas-Olaria R; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Alzghari T; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Dell'Aquila M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Leith J; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Castagnini S; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy., Lau C; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Girardi LN; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA., Gaudino M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
The external stenting of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been proven to reduce intimal hyperplasia (IH) in animal models, paving the way for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be conducted. Herein, we performed a study-level meta-analysis to assess the impact of the Venous External SupporT (VEST) device, an external stent, on the outcomes of SVGs. A systematic search was conducted to identify all RCTs comparing VEST-stented to non-stented SVGs in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was graft occlusion. The main secondary outcomes were repeat revascularization, SVG IH area, and intimal-medial thickness. Two RCTs totaling 407 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, there was no difference in graft occlusion between groups (incidence rate ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.53). The rate of repeat revascularization was also similar (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27-1.64). The IH area (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.45; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.10) and intimal-medial thickness (SMD: -0.50; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.10) were significantly reduced in the VEST group. Our findings show that significant reductions in the IH area and the intimal-medial thickness in VEST-stented SVGs do not currently translate into a lesser need for repeat revascularization or less graft occlusion events compared to non-stented SVGs at 1.5 years after CABG. |
