Optimal method for reliable lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm.

Autor: Cho KR; Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05029, Seoul, Republic of Korea., Lee HS; Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05029, Seoul, Republic of Korea., Kim M; Department of Neurosurgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, 25440, Republic of Korea., Park SK; Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05029, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 20200476@kuh.ac.kr., Park K; Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05029, Seoul, Republic of Korea. kwanpark@skku.edu.; Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. kwanpark@skku.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 Dec 07; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 21672. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 07.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49008-1
Abstrakt: In this study, we propose an optimal method for monitoring the key electrophysiological sign, the Lateral Spread Response (LSR), during microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery for hemifacial spasm (HFS). Current monitoring methods and interpretations of LSR remain unclear, leading to potential misinterpretations and undesirable outcomes." We prospectively collected data from patients undergoing MVD for HFS, including basic demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Stimulation intensity was escalated by 1 mA increments to identify the optimal range for effective LSR. We designated the threshold at which we can observe LSR as THR1 and THR2 for when LSR disappears, with high-intensity stimulation (30 mA) designated as THR30. Subsequently, we compared abnormal muscle responses (AMR) between the optimal range (between THR1 and THR2) and THR30. Additionally, we conducted an analysis to identify and assess factors associated with artifacts and their potential impact on clinical outcomes. As stimulation intensity increases, the onset latency to detect AMR was shortened. The first finding of the study was high intensity stimulation caused artifact that mimic the wave of LSR. Those artifacts were observed even after decompression thus interfere interpretation of disappearance of LSR. Analyzing the factors related to the artifact, we found the AMR detected at onset latency below 9.6 ms would be the lateral spreading artifact (LSA) rather than true LSR. To avoid false positive LSR from LSA, we should stepwise increase stimulation intensity and not to surpass the intensity that cause LSR onset latency below 10 ms.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: