Longitudinal measurement invariance of constructs derived from the addiction cycle.
Autor: | Boness CL; Center on Alcohol, Substance Use And Addictions, University of New Mexico., Votaw VR; Center on Alcohol, Substance Use And Addictions, University of New Mexico., Stein ER; VA Puget Sound Healthcare System., Hallgren KA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington., Witkiewitz K; Center on Alcohol, Substance Use And Addictions, University of New Mexico. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors [Psychol Addict Behav] 2024 Sep; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 649-655. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 07. |
DOI: | 10.1037/adb0000976 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: The Alcohol Addiction Research Domain Criteria (AARDoC) is an organizational framework for assessing heterogeneity in addictive disorders organized across the addiction cycle domains of incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive functioning and may have benefits for precision medicine. Recent work found pretreatment self-report items mapped onto the addiction cycle domains and predicted 1- and 3-year alcohol use disorder treatment outcomes. Given the potential utility of the addiction cycle domains for predicting relevant treatment outcomes, this study sought to evaluate the longitudinal measurement invariance of the domains. Method: We conducted a secondary analysis of individuals with alcohol use disorder ( n = 1,383, 30.9% female, 76.8% non-Hispanic White, 11.2% Hispanic) who participated in the COMBINE study. Eleven items assessed at pre- and posttreatment were included in exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and longitudinal invariance analyses. Results: The pre- and posttreatment ESEM models had factor loadings consistent with the three addiction cycle domains and fit the data well. The ESEM factor structure was invariant from pre- to posttreatment (representing configural invariance) and metric invariance (factor loadings) was largely supported, but analyses failed to support scalar invariance (item-level thresholds) of the addiction cycle domains. Conclusions: A three-factor structure representing addiction cycle domains can be modeled using brief self-report measures pre- and posttreatment. Individuals demonstrated a downward shift in the level of item endorsement, indicating improvement with treatment. Although this 11-item measure might be useful at baseline for informing treatment decisions, results indicate the need to exercise caution in comparing the addiction cycle domains pre- to posttreatment within persons. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved). |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |