Estimating cardiac output from coronary CT angiography: an individualized compartment model in comparison to the Stewart-Hamilton method.

Autor: Leiknes JB; Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway., Hiorth A; Department of Energy Resources, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway., Havnen J; Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway., Greve OJ; Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway., Kurz KD; Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway., Larsen AI; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.; Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine [Front Cardiovasc Med] 2023 Nov 20; Vol. 10, pp. 1156332. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 20 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1156332
Abstrakt: Background: Attenuation is correlated with the concentration of contrast medium (CM) in the arteries. The cardiac output (CO) affects the concentration of CM in the circulatory system; therefore, CO affects the time-density curve (TDC). Thus, estimating CO using TDC from test-bolus images acquired in computed tomography (CT) is possible. In this study, we compare two methods of estimating CO, namely, an individualized mathematical compartment model, integrating patient, contrast, and scanning factors with TDC, and the Stewart-Hamilton method based on the area under the curve of the TDC.
Materials and Methods: Attenuation in the aorta was measured during test-bolus in 40 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Each participant underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following CCTA to validate the estimated CO. The individual compartment model used TDC in conjunction with scanning and patient-specific parameters to estimate the concentration of CM and CO over time. This was compared to the CO calculated from the area under the curve using the Stewart-Hamilton method.
Results: Both CO estimated with our individualized compartment model ( r  = 0.66, p  < 0.01) and the Stewart-Hamilton method ( r  = 0.53, p  < 0.01) were moderately correlated with CO measured with cardiac MRI. Body surface area (BSA) and time to peak (TTP) affected the accuracy of our model. Lower BSA resulted in overestimation, and lower TTP resulted in CO underestimation, respectively. We found no gender-specific difference in the accuracy of our model when correcting for BSA. The Stewart-Hamilton method performed better with a more complete TDC, whereas the compartment model performed better overall with a partial TDC.
Conclusion: The TDC acquired in CCTA allows for CO estimation. Both the Stewart-Hamilton method and our mathematical compartment model show moderate correlation when applied to our data, although each method has its strengths and limitations. If the majority of the TDC is known, the Stewart-Hamilton method may be more reliable, but an individual compartment model is preferable when there are insufficient data points in the TDC. Regardless, both methods can potentially increase the diagnostic information acquired from a CCTA, which is increasingly recommended in clinical guidelines.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
(© 2023 Leiknes, Hiorth, Havnen, Greve, Kurz and Larsen.)
Databáze: MEDLINE