Giving time a chance in the midsession reversal task.

Autor: Soares C; School of Psychology, University of Minho, Gualtar Campus, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal. csoares@psi.uminho.pt., Pinto C; School of Psychology, University of Minho, Gualtar Campus, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal., Machado A; William James Center for Research, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Learning & behavior [Learn Behav] 2024 Sep; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 236-248. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 20.
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00606-z
Abstrakt: The midsession reversal task involves a simultaneous discrimination between stimuli S1 and S2. Choice of S1 but not S2 is reinforced during the first 40 trials, and choice of S2 but not S1 is reinforced during the last 40 trials. Trials are separated by a constant intertrial interval (ITI). Pigeons learn the task seemingly by timing the moment of the reversal trial. Hence, most of their errors occur around trial 40 (S2 choices before trial 41 and S1 choices after trial 40). It has been found that when the ITI is doubled on a test session, the reversal trial is halved, a result consistent with timing. However, inconsistent with timing, halving the ITI on a test session did not double the reversal trial. The asymmetry of ITI effects could be due to the intrusion of novel cues during testing, cues that preempt the timing cue. To test this hypothesis, we ran two types of tests after the regular training in the midsession reversal task, one with S1 and S2 choices always reinforced, and another with S1 always reinforced but S2 reinforced only after 20 trials when the ITI doubled or 40 trials when the ITI halved. For most pigeons, performance was consistent with timing both when the ITI doubled and when it was halved, but some pigeons appeared to follow strategies based on counting or on reinforcement contingencies.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: