Outcomes of early cannulation arteriovenous graft versus PTFE arteriovenous graft in hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
| Autor: | Xiao Z; Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.; Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China., Rotmans JI; Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands., Letachowicz K; Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland., Franchin M; Vascular Surgery Unit, Circolo University Teaching Hospital, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy., D'Oria M; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The journal of vascular access [J Vasc Access] 2024 Nov; Vol. 25 (6), pp. 1749-1756. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 07. |
| DOI: | 10.1177/11297298231205325 |
| Abstrakt: | Arteriovenous graft (AVG) is an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage renal disease when their permanent vascular accesses fail. Since the last decades, the most widely used materials in these patients have been polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-AVGs. Recently, several studies have reported that early cannulation (EC)-AVG can be an alternative to PTFE-AVG. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of EC-AVG and PTFE-AVG in HD patients. We searched the Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the relevant studies published from 01.01.2000 to 19.12.2022 by keywords and free words. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies comparing EC-AVG with PTFE-AVG were included. Ten studies were included in analysis: one RCT, six retrospective cohort studies, and three prospective cohort studies. The results showed shorter cannulation intervals (four studies, 1116 participants: mean difference -23.62 days, 95% CI [-32.03, -15.21], p < 0.05) and less central venous catheter (CVC) usage (four studies, 733 participants: OR 0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.92], p < 0.05) for EC-AVG compared with PTFE-AVG, while comparable outcomes of primary patency (eight studies, 1712 participants: HR 0.89, 95% CI [0.70, 1.12]), primary assisted patency (five studies, 1355 participants: HR 1.13, 95% CI [0.70, 1.84]), secondary patency (nine studies, 1920 participants: HR 0.93, 95% CI [0.66, 1.31]), and infection risk (four studies, 640 participants: HR 1.12, 95% CI [0.48, 2.58]). When compared to PTFE-AVG in HD patients, EC-AVG seems to exhibit shorter cannulation intervals, less CVC usage, and comparable outcomes of graft patency, and infection risk. Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|