| Autor: |
Cossio A; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia., Bautista-Gomez MM; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia., Alexander N; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia., Del Castillo AM; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia., Castro MDM; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia., Castaño-Grajales PY; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia., Gutiérrez-Poloche YH; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia., Zuluaga LS; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia., Vargas-Bernal L; Universidad Icesi, Grupo i2t, Cali, Colombia., Navarro A; Universidad Icesi, Grupo i2t, Cali, Colombia., Saravia NG; Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.; Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia. |
| Abstrakt: |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a global health problem. Compelled by the protracted healing process, initial and final outcomes of treatment are determined at 90 and 180 days, respectively, after initiation of treatment. Loss to follow-up during these intervals is substantial. Consequently, the effectiveness of treatment is largely unknown. We conducted an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design study of a community-based mobile health (mHealth) strategy to monitor adherence to anti-leishmanial treatment, adverse drug reactions, and therapeutic response compared with standard of care in two rural communities of Colombia. Three implementation outcomes were evaluated: usability and acceptability by qualitative methods and fidelity using quantitative methods. Fifty-seven patients were prospectively included in the mHealth intervention and 48 in the standard-of-care group. In addition, 24 community health leaders (CHLs), health workers, and patients participated in qualitative evaluations. The intervention significantly increased the proportion of patients having follow-up of therapeutic outcomes 90 and 180 days after initiating treatment from 4.2% (standard of care) to 82.5% (intervention), P < 0.001. The proportion of patients having records of treatment adherence, adverse drug reactions, and therapeutic response also increased significantly (P < 0.001). Fidelity to the intervention (recording of treatment adherence, adverse drug reactions, lesion photographs, and evaluation of therapeutic response) was 70-100%. The app was highly accepted by CHLs, health workers, and patients, who perceived that the app improved case identification and follow-up and met a public health need. Although usability was high, low connectivity affected real-time transmission of data. This community-based mHealth strategy facilitated access to health care for CL in rural areas and knowledge of treatment effectiveness. |
