Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for early versus late sepsis-related pouch failure.

Autor: Maspero M; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MariannaMaspero., Lavryk O; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/OlgaLavryk., Lipman J; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH., Valente M; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH., Kessler H; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH., Holubar S; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/HolubarStefan., Steele SR; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/ScottRSteeleMD., Hull T; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH. Electronic address: hullt@ccf.org.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Surgery [Surgery] 2023 Oct; Vol. 174 (4), pp. 801-807. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 04.
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.016
Abstrakt: Background: Pouch failure after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis occurs in 5% to 15% of cases, mostly due to septic complications. We aimed to determine if the timing of pouch failure impacted long-term outcomes for redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after sepsis-related complications.
Method: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected institutional pouch database. Patients who underwent redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for septic complications between 1988 and 2020 were divided into an early (pouch failure within 6 months of stoma closure after index operation, or stoma never closed) and a late failure group (pouch failure after 6 months of stoma closure). The primary endpoint was pouch survival.
Results: In total, 335 patients were included: 241 (72%) in the early and 94 (28%) in the late failure group. The most common indication for failure was an anastomotic leak in the early failure group (163, 68%) and fistula in the late failure group (59, 63%), P < .001. Pouch survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 77%, 75%, and 72% for the early and 79%, 75%, and 68% for the late failure group (P = .94). The most common reason for redo pouch failure was fistula in both groups. Quality of life was similar in both groups. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with pouch failure was the final diagnosis of Crohn's disease.
Conclusion: Outcomes after redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were comparable between patients with early and late sepsis-related index pouch failure, with acceptable rates of long-term pouch survival and good quality of life.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: