Automatic threat processing shows evidence of exclusivity.
| Autor: | March DS; Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USAmarch@psy.fsu.eduhttps://psy.fsu.edu/faculty/marchd/march.dp.php., Olson MA; Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA olson@utk.edu gaertner@utk.eduhttps://psychology.utk.edu/faculty/gaertner.php., Gaertner L; Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA olson@utk.edu gaertner@utk.eduhttps://psychology.utk.edu/faculty/gaertner.php. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The Behavioral and brain sciences [Behav Brain Sci] 2023 Jul 18; Vol. 46, pp. e131. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 18. |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X22002928 |
| Abstrakt: | De Neys argues against assigning exclusive capacities to automatic versus controlled processes. The dual implicit process model provides a theoretical rationale for the exclusivity of automatic threat processing, and corresponding data provide empirical evidence of such exclusivity. De Neys's dismissal of exclusivity is premature and based on a limited sampling of psychological research. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|