Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Effective in Improving Quality of Life?: A Systematic Review.
| Autor: | Pollock M, Hutchinson AM, Ockerby C, Driscoll A |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of cardiovascular nursing [J Cardiovasc Nurs] 2024 Jul-Aug 01; Vol. 39 (4), pp. E126-E135. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 12. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001007 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) without surgical intervention is associated with morbidity and mortality and is the most common valvular disease in the western world. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive surgical option that has become a common treatment for people unable to undergo open aortic valve replacement; despite the increase in TAVI offerings in the last decade, patient quality of life (QoL) outcomes postoperatively are poorly understood. Objective: The aim of this review was to determine whether TAVI is effective in improving QoL. Method: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted, and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019122753). MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies published between 2008 and 2021. Search terms included "transcatheter aortic valve replacement" and "quality of life" and their synonyms. Included studies were evaluated, dependent on study design, using either the Risk of Bias-2 or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Seventy studies were included in the review. Results: Authors of the studies used a wide variety of QoL assessment instruments and follow-up durations; authors of most studies identified an improvement in QoL, and a small number identified a decline in QoL or no change from baseline. Conclusion: Although authors of the vast majority of studies identified an improvement in QoL, there was very little consistency in instrument choice or follow-up duration; this made analysis and comparison difficult. A consistent approach to measuring QoL for patients who undergo TAVI is needed to enable comparison of outcomes. A richer, more nuanced understanding of QoL outcomes after TAVI could help clinicians support patient decision making and evaluate outcomes. Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|