A systematic review of U.S. nursing faculty's knowledge, awareness, inclusion, and perceived importance of sexual and gender minority-related content in nursing curricula.

Autor: Moore SE; Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: sem167@case.edu., Coleman CL; School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN., Hughes TL; Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY., Dorsen C; School of Nursing, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ., Smith SK; School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN., Bower KM; Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD., Clochesy JM; School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL., Clark K; College of Health and Human Services, University of New Hampshire, The University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH., Sherman ADF; Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Nursing outlook [Nurs Outlook] 2023 May-Jun; Vol. 71 (3), pp. 101950. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 14.
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101950
Abstrakt: Background: In the US, sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals continue to experience health inequities, and nursing curricula content and nursing faculty with SGM health expertise in the US remain limited. Addressing health disparities begins with the preparation of future nurses-US nursing faculty must be supported to meet these growing needs.
Purpose: To describe, appraise, and synthesize research from 2000-2020 on US nursing faculty knowledge, awareness, inclusion, and perceived importance of SGM health content.
Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we registered a systematic review and appraisal protocol in PROSPERO, and then executed the protocol and synthesized the literature.
Discussion: We found an empirical evidence base surrounding US nursing faculty and SGM health much more limited than expected. Only four cross-sectional, descriptive empirical articles fit the a priori inclusion criteria. The studies were of moderate quality at best and often relied on unvalidated or older measures. In general, the studies focused on examining characteristics of nursing programs, faculty comfort with content, faculty perceptions of content importance, and hours dedicated to content.
Conclusion: Since the close of the review, new commentaries and editorials expanding the call for change in the US were published-the time for commentary has passed. It remains unclear whether US nursing faculty are adequately prepared to educate future nurses about SGM health issues-and an unprepared healthcare workforce is yet another barrier to SGM health equity. The evidence base supporting US nursing faculty development desperately needs more studies using rigorous methodologies.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: