Comparative Fluoride Ion Release Pre and Postrecharge Situations among Three Different Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Autor: | Mathias MR; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Rathi N; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Bendgude VD; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Tirupathi S; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Chauhan RS; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Borde A; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Lath T; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Shah SS; Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry [Int J Clin Pediatr Dent] 2022 Nov-Dec; Vol. 15 (6), pp. 729-735. |
DOI: | 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2461 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: To determine the initial fluoride (F) release and rerelease after recharge of three pediatric dental restorative materials when aged in artificial saliva (M1) and deionized water (M2). Materials and Methods: A total of 30 disks, 10 disks of each restorative material R1: Jen Rainbow, Jen Dent Ukraine; R2: Tetric® N-Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent, and R3: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Fuji II LC- GC Corporation) were fabricated and were tested for F dynamics in two different media, M1: artificial saliva, M2: deionized water group. The F initial release was measured on the 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 30th day, and on the 31st day, acidulated phosphate F (APF) gel was applied and F rerelease was measured on the 31st, 37th, 44th, 51st, and 60th day using F ion-specific electrode (Orion). The result was statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni test. Results: Fluoride (F) ion release was significantly higher in deionized water than in artificial saliva (M1), and F ion rerelease (after recharge) was significantly higher in artificial saliva (M1). Fuji-II LC demonstrated a significantly ( p < 0.05) higher F release and rerelease among all the tested materials. Among the tested composites, R2: Tetric® N-Flow exhibited significantly higher F dynamics than R1: Jen Rainbow composite. Conclusion: All the tested restorative materials exhibited optimum F release (0.024 ppm, that is, the range to prevent newer carious lesions) in both the pre and postrecharge conditions. Even though Fuji-II LC demonstrated significantly better F dynamics in the tested scenarios, Tetric® N-Flow has the additional advantage of improved mechanical retentive and esthetic properties along with the optimum F release in pre and postrecharge scenarios. How to Cite This Article: Mathias MR, Rathi N, Bendgude VD, et al. Comparative Fluoride Ion Release Pre and Postrecharge Situations among Three Different Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):729-735. Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None (Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |