[Bone defect closure after resection of sphenoorbital meningioma].

Autor: Lasunin NV; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia., Abdullaev AN; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia., Cherekaev VA; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia., Okishev DN; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia., Grigorieva NN; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia., Kozlov AV; Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Jazyk: English; Russian
Zdroj: Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko [Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko] 2023; Vol. 87 (1), pp. 96-103.
DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238701196
Abstrakt: Sphenoorbital meningiomas (SOM) are a subgroup of skull base tumors with soft tissue component in the orbit and anterior and/or middle cranial fossa. According to different authors, SOMs account for 2-12% of all intracranial meningiomas. Reconstruction of bone defects after resection of SOM has own nuances. Along with cranial vault repair, patients encounter with cosmetic defects following facial skull lesion, ophthalmic symptoms due to orbital defects, dental and functional problems associated with opening of the mouth in case of damage to maxilla and mandible. Predominant infiltrative growth of tumor and common large bone defects involving various anatomical regions require multiple implants or implants with complex shape. Moreover, contact of implantation area with nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses requires additional impermeability of soft tissue reconstruction and inertness of materials.
Objective: To summarize available modern data on bone defect closure after resection of SOM.
Material and Methods: The authors reviewed available data on bone defect closure after resection of SOM. Effectiveness of modern methods of reconstruction and safety of materials were assessed.
Results: We analyzed 96 available references. Technical features of tumor resection, materials used for bone defect closure and modern possibilities of 3D technologies in reconstructive surgery were described. The authors proposed the algorithms for selecting the materials for bone defect closure after resection of SOM.
Conclusion: Improvement of surgical technique and development of new materials and technologies significantly improve cosmetic and functional results. A large percentage of negative ophthalmologic outcomes and high risk of complications in SOM surgery require further studies and elaboration of modern techniques.
Databáze: MEDLINE