Assessment of methane emissions from a California landfill using concurrent experimental, inventory, and modeling approaches.

Autor: Yeşiller N; Global Waste Research Institute, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA. Electronic address: nyesiller@gmail.com., Hanson JL; Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo CA, 93407, USA. Electronic address: jahanson@calpoly.edu., Manheim DC; Global Waste Research Institute, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA. Electronic address: dmanheim@calpoly.edu., Newman S; Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 375 Beale St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA. Electronic address: snewman@baaqmd.gov., Guha A; Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 375 Beale St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA. Electronic address: aguha@baaqmd.gov.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Waste management (New York, N.Y.) [Waste Manag] 2022 Dec; Vol. 154, pp. 146-159. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 12.
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.09.024
Abstrakt: Methane flux and emissions were obtained at a California landfill concurrently using field measurements, inventory analyses, and modeling. Measured fluxes ranged from -3.7 to 828 g/m 2 -day and generally decreased from daily to intermediate to final covers. Soil covers with high-plasticity clay had the lowest fluxes. Whole-site emissions ranged from 406 to 47,414 tonnes/year (11,368 to 1,327,592 tonnes CO 2 -eq./year), and were dominated by intermediate covers with high relative surface area. Emissions estimates from flux chamber tests and California Landfill Methane Inventory Model (CALMIM) with oxidation were similar and low, whereas emissions from aerial measurements and CALMIM without oxidation were similar and high. The inventory analyses provided intermediate emissions and a new Gaussian plume model based on ground cavity ring-down spectrometer measurements provided the highest emissions. The assumptions used and the inherent strengths and limitations of the different approaches resulted in the flux and emissions differences. With varied attributes (experimental/modeling; flux/emissions; whole-site/cover-specific, top-down/bottom-up), the approaches provide envelopes of methane emissions and can be used selectively for the two main purposes of landfill methane emissions analysis: to mechanistically determine the factors that control/limit surface emissions and to provide data for atmospheric methane analysis. To reduce emissions, progression from temporary to permanent cover areas can be accelerated and covers with coarser materials can be amended with plastic fines.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE