Development, Validity, and Reliability of the Perceived Telemedicine Importance, Disadvantages, and Barriers (PTIDB) Questionnaire for Egyptian Healthcare Professionals.
Autor: | Youssef N; Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia., Ghazy RM; Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21561, Egypt., Mahdy RE; Department of Internal Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt., Abdalgabar M; Department of Gastroenterology, Police Authority Hospital, Giza 0000, Egypt., Elshaarawy O; Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menofia 32511, Egypt., Alboraie M; Department of Internal Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | International journal of environmental research and public health [Int J Environ Res Public Health] 2022 Oct 04; Vol. 19 (19). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 04. |
DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph191912678 |
Abstrakt: | Background: This study aimed to develop and investigate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Telemedicine Importance, Disadvantages, and Barriers (PTIDB) questionnaire for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Egypt. This study was conducted in three phases: (1) development of the questionnaire, (2) preliminary testing of the questionnaire, and (3) investigation of its validity and reliability using a large survey. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted over two months. A convenience sample of 691 HCPs and clerks from 22 governorates accessed the online survey. The construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal reliability. Results: The initial Eigenvalues showed that all 19 items of the questionnaire explained 56.0% of the variance in three factors. For Factor 1 (importance), eight items were loaded on one factor, with factor loading ranging from 0.61 to 0.78. For Factor 2 (disadvantages), seven items were loaded on one factor with factor loading ranging from 0.60 to 0.79. For Factor 3 (barriers), four items were loaded on one factor, with factor loading ranging from 0.60 to 0.86. The CFA showed that All loadings ranged from 0.4 to 1.0, with CFI = 0.93 and RMSEA = 0.061. All the factors had satisfactory reliability; 0.87 for ''Importance'', 0.82 for ''Disadvantages'', and 0.79 for ''Barriers''. Conclusion: The PTIDB questionnaire has an acceptable level of validity and internal consistency, at a readability level of 12th grade. The retest reliability, however, still needs to be tested. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |