Excluding Hollow Viscus Injury for Abdominal Seat Belt Sign Using Computed Tomography.

Autor:	Delaplain PT; Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine., Tay-Lasso E; Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine., Biffl WL; Trauma Department, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, California., Schaffer KB; Trauma Department, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, California., Sundel M; Program in Trauma, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore., Behdin S; Program in Trauma, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore., Ghneim M; Program in Trauma, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore., Costantini TW; Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego., Santorelli JE; Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego., Switzer E; Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Schellenberg M; Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Keeley JA; Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery/Surgical Critical Care, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California., Kim DY; Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery/Surgical Critical Care, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California., Wang A; Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California., Dhillon NK; Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California., Patel D; Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California., Campion EM; Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado., Robinson CK; Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado., Kartiko S; Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC., Quintana MT; Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC., Estroff JM; Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC., Kirby KA; Center for Statistical Consulting, Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine., Nahmias J; Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	JAMA surgery [JAMA Surg] 2022 Sep 01; Vol. 157 (9), pp. 771-778.
DOI:	10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2770
Abstrakt:	Importance: Abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) has historically entailed admission and observation because of the diagnostic limitations of computed tomography (CT) imaging and high rates of hollow viscus injury (HVI). Recent single-institution, observational studies have questioned the utility of this practice. Objective: To evaluate whether a negative CT scan can safely predict the absence of HVI in the setting of an abdominal SBS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 9 level I trauma centers between August 2020 and October 2021 and included adult trauma patients with abdominal SBS. Exposures: Inclusion in the study required abdominal CT as part of the initial trauma evaluation and before any surgical intervention, if performed. Results of CT scans were considered positive if they revealed any of the following: abdominal wall soft tissue contusion, free fluid, bowel wall thickening, mesenteric stranding, mesenteric hematoma, bowel dilation, pneumatosis, or pneumoperitoneum. Main Outcomes and Measures: Presence of HVI diagnosed at the time of operative intervention. Results: A total of 754 patients with abdominal SBS had an HVI prevalence of 9.2% (n = 69), with only 1 patient with HVI (0.1%) having a negative CT (ie, none of the 8 a priori CT findings). On bivariate analysis comparing patients with and without HVI, there were significant associations between each of the individual CT scan findings and the presence of HVI. The strongest association was found with the presence of free fluid, with a more than 40-fold increase in the likelihood of HVI (odds ratio [OR], 42.68; 95% CI, 20.48-88.94; P < .001). The presence of free fluid also served as the most effective binary classifier for presence of HVI (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.91). There was also an association between a negative CT scan and the absence of HVI (OR, 41.09; 95% CI, 9.01-727.69; P < .001; AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.66-0.70). Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of HVI among patients with an abdominal SBS and negative findings on CT is extremely low, if not zero. The practice of admitting and observing all patients with abdominal SBS should be reconsidered when a high-quality CT scan is negative, which may lead to significant resource and cost savings.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu