Adaptation of removable partial denture rest seats in prostheses made with selective laser sintering or casting techniques: A randomized clinical trial.

Autor: Pelletier S; Masters student in Dental Science, Department of General Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Laval University, Québec, Canada; and Private practice, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: samuel.pelletier.2@ulaval.ca., Pelletier A; Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Laval University, Québec, Canada., Al Dika G; Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [J Prosthet Dent] 2024 Jul; Vol. 132 (1), pp. 108-114. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 30.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.006
Abstrakt: Statement of Problem: New fabrication techniques have been developed for removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks although studies validating the clinical application of these techniques are scarce.
Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the adaptation of RPD framework rests made with conventional casting or computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) with selective laser sintering (SLS) at the clinical evaluation and 1 year after the delivery of the prostheses.
Material and Methods: This triple-blinded pilot study included 18 participants presenting with maxillary and/or mandibular partial edentulism, of which only 7 returned for the second measurement 1 year after prosthesis delivery. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups depending on whether the RPD framework was made with SLS or conventional lost-wax casting. The adaptation of the RPD at the rest seat area was evaluated by injecting a silicone material on the abutment tooth before seating. The silicone specimens were then sectioned transversely and measured with a scanning electron microscope. The statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed-effect model with the intention to treat and with a 3-factor repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05).
Results: At the metal framework evaluation (T 0 ), the prostheses made with SLS showed a mean ±standard deviation adaptation of 398 ±45 μm, while those made with conventional casting presented a mean ±standard deviation adaptation of 176 ±41 μm (P=.009). One year after the delivery of the prostheses (T 1 ), the adaptation of the frameworks made with conventional casting was still significantly better (88 ±6 μm versus 197 ±94 μm, P=.03).
Conclusions: Frameworks made with SLS showed worse clinical accuracy at the rest than frameworks produced with conventional casting.
(Copyright © 2022 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: