Group therapy for schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) should redo their meta-analysis.
| Autor: | Moritz S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg., Turner D; Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universitiet., Bechdolf A; Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Charité Medicine., Mueller DR; University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern., Woodward TS; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia., Penney D; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Douglas Mental Health University Institute., Mehl S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) [Psychotherapy (Chic)] 2022 Jun; Vol. 59 (2), pp. 133-135. |
| DOI: | 10.1037/pst0000401 |
| Abstrakt: | Comments on the meta-analysis by G. M. Burlingame et al. (see record 2020-37337-001) on group therapy in schizophrenia. The commenting authors explain why they think that the meta-analysis is seriously flawed and should be recalculated and updated. First, however, they briefly reflect on the role of meta-analyses in contemporary research to emphasize that this discussion is not merely an academic debate but may have significant implications for the psychotherapeutic landscape as a whole. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved). |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|