Does audio-visual information result in improved health-related decision-making compared with audio-only or visual-only information? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor:	Stacey JE; NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK jemaine.stacey@ntu.ac.uk., Atkin C; NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK., Henshaw H; Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK., Roberts KL; NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK., Allen HA; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK., Justice LV; NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK., Badham SP; NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2022 Apr 29; Vol. 12 (4), pp. e059599. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 29.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059599
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Making health-related decisions can be difficult due to the amount and complexity of information available. Audio-visual information may improve memory for health information but whether audio-visual information can enhance health-related decisions has not been explored using quantitative methods. The objective of this systematic review is to understand how effective audio-visual information is for informing health-related decision-making compared with audio-only or visual-only information. Methods and Analysis: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be included if they include audio-visual and either audio-only or visual-only information provision and decision-making in a health setting. Studies will be excluded if they are not reported in English. Twelve databases will be searched including: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and PsychINFO. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (V.7) will be used to assess risk of bias in included RCTs. Results will be synthesised primarily using a meta-analysis; where quantitative data are not reported, a narrative synthesis will be used. Ethics and Dissemination: No ethical issues are foreseen. Data will be disseminated via academic publication and conference presentations. Findings may also be published in scientific newsletters and magazines. This review is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021255725. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu