| Autor: |
Lucassen DA; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands., Brouwer-Brolsma EM; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands., Slotegraaf AI; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands., Kok E; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands., Feskens EJM; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Nutrients [Nutrients] 2022 Mar 09; Vol. 14 (6). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 09. |
| DOI: |
10.3390/nu14061156 |
| Abstrakt: |
During recent years, the integration of technology has substantially improved self-reported dietary assessment methods, such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQ), food records, and 24-h recalls. To further reduce measurement error, additional innovations are urgently needed. Memory-related measurement error is one of the aspects that warrants attention, which is where new smartphone technologies and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approaches provide a unique opportunity. In this article, we describe the DIASS study, which was designed to evaluate an innovative 2-h recall (2hR) smartphone-based methodology, against traditional 24-h recalls, FFQ, and biomarkers, to assess both actual and habitual dietary intake. It is hypothesized that a 2-h reporting window decreases reliance on memory and reporting burden, and increases data accuracy. We included 215 men (28%) and women (72%), with a mean ± SD age of 39 ± 19 years and a mean ± SD BMI of 23.8 ± 4.0. Most participants were highly educated (58%). Response rates for the various dietary assessment methods were >90%. Besides the evaluation of the accuracy, usability, and perceived burden of the 2hR methodology, the study set-up also allows for (further) evaluation of the other administrated dietary assessment tools. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
