A CBPR-Enhanced Delphi Method: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success Case Study.

Autor:	Brush BL; University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Lee SD; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA., Gabrysiak A; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Jensen M; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Wilson-Powers E; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Coombe CM; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Chandanabhumma PP; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Valerio M; The University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA., Israel BA; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Lachance L; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education [Health Educ Behav] 2024 Apr; Vol. 51 (2), pp. 212-217. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 22.
DOI:	10.1177/10901981221076400
Abstrakt:	As part of a 5-year study to develop and validate an instrument for measuring success in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, we utilized the Delphi method with a panel of 16 community and academic CBPR experts to assess face and content validity of the instrument's broad concepts of success and measurement items. In addition to incorporating quantitative and qualitative feedback from two online surveys, we included a 2-day face-to-face meeting with the Expert Panel to invite open discussion and diversity of opinion in line with the CBPR principles framing and guiding the study. The face-to-face meeting allowed experts to review the survey data (with maintained anonymity), convey their perspectives, and offer interpretations that were untapped in the online surveys. Using a CBPR approach facilitated a synergistic process that moved above and beyond the consensus achieved in the initial Delphi rounds, to enhance the Delphi technique and the development of items in the instrument. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu