Can ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block be an alternative option for forearm reduction in the emergency department? A prospective randomized study.

Autor:	Tekin E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey., Aydin ME; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.; Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey., Turgut MC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey., Karagoz S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey., Ates I; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey., Ahiskalioglu EO; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.; Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Clinical and experimental emergency medicine [Clin Exp Emerg Med] 2021 Dec; Vol. 8 (4), pp. 307-313. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 31.
DOI:	10.15441/ceem.20.136
Abstrakt:	Objective: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular nerve block (IB) has become a well-established method in several outpatient procedures; however, its use in emergency departments (EDs) remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare procedural sedation and anlagesia (PSA) and IB in the pain management for patients who underwent forearm fracture reduction in the ED. Methods: This prospective randomized study included 60 patients aged 18 to 65 years, who visited the ED with forearm fractures. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group PSA (n=30) and Group IB (n=30). The pain scores of patients were evaluated before and during the procedure with the visual analog scale. Complications and patient and operator satisfaction levels were recorded. Results: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics. The median (interquartile range) pain scores observed during the procedures were significantly higher in Group PSA than in Group IB (4 [4-6] vs. 2 [0-2], respectively; P<0.001). Patient and operator satisfaction levels were significantly higher in Group IB (P<0.001). Oxygen desaturation was statistically higher in Group PSA than in Group IB (40.00% vs. 3.33%, respectively; P=0.002). Conclusion: IB was an effective alternative for reducing pain and increasing patient satisfaction in ED patients undergoing forearm fracture reduction.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu