Unconventional monetary policy and disaster risk: Evidence from the subprime and COVID-19 crises.

Autor: Cortes GS; Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, 306 Stuzin Hall, PO Box 117168, Gainesville 32611-7168, FL, USA., Gao GP; Quantitative Equities, T. Rowe Price, 100 E. Pratt St., Baltimore 21202, MD, USA., Silva FBG; Trulaske College of Business, University of Missouri, 425 Cornell Hall, Columbia 65211, MO, USA., Song Z; Johns Hopkins University, Carey Business School, 100 International Drive, Baltimore 21202, MD, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of international money and finance [J Int Money Finance] 2022 Apr; Vol. 122, pp. 102543. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 23.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102543
Abstrakt: We compare the interventions conducted by the Federal Reserve in response to the subprime and COVID-19 crises with respect to their effectiveness in reducing disaster risk. Using model-free measures of disaster risk derived from daily options data, we document that interventions in response to both crises reduced tail risks in domestic equity markets. The spillover effects of the two crises have been markedly dissimilar. While subprime interventions are generally characterized by negative spillovers to international equity markets, policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis are generally associated with positive spillovers. We interpret these results as consistent with the different degrees of protagonism by central banks in the two episodes, emphasizing the importance of a broader participation of monetary authorities in expanding their balance sheets to counteract the effects of major crises.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(© 2021 The Authors.)
Databáze: MEDLINE