Closely related gull species show contrasting foraging strategies in an urban environment.
| Autor: | Lato KA; School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. kimberly.lato@stonybrook.edu., Madigan DJ; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada., Veit RR; Department of Biology, College of Staten Island (CSI), CUNY, Staten Island, NY, USA., Thorne LH; School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2021 Dec 08; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 23619. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 08. |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-02821-y |
| Abstrakt: | The expansion of urban landscapes has both negative and positive effects on wildlife. Understanding how different species respond to urbanization is key to assessing how urban landscapes influence regional wildlife behavior and ecosystem structure. Gulls are often described as strong urban adapters, but few studies have explored species-specific differences in habitat use. Here, we use GPS tracking in conjunction with stable isotope analysis (SIA) to quantify the habitat use and trophic ecology of great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus) and herring gulls (L. argentatus) in an urbanized area. Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) of foraging locations revealed significant differences in the habitat use between species. Great black-backed gulls foraged primarily in marine habitats and herring gulls foraged primarily in specific urban habitats (e.g., landfills, dumpsters) and showed higher site fidelity in terms of the proportion of foraging sites revisited. Further, great black-backed gulls had significantly higher δ 15 N and δ 13 C than herring gulls, reflecting the use of marine, rather than urban, food sources. This study highlights the variability in urban habitat utilization among closely related species, assesses stable isotope signatures of urban diets in wild birds, and discusses ecological implications of the relative contribution of urban and marine foraging. (© 2021. The Author(s).) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|