A Systematic Review Examining the Approaches Used to Estimate Interindividual Differences in Trainability and Classify Individual Responses to Exercise Training.
Autor: | Bonafiglia JT; School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada., Preobrazenski N; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada., Gurd BJ; School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Frontiers in physiology [Front Physiol] 2021 Nov 08; Vol. 12, pp. 665044. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 08 (Print Publication: 2021). |
DOI: | 10.3389/fphys.2021.665044 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Many reports describe statistical approaches for estimating interindividual differences in trainability and classifying individuals as "responders" or "non-responders." The extent to which studies in the exercise training literature have adopted these statistical approaches remains unclear. Objectives: This systematic review primarily sought to determine the extent to which studies in the exercise training literature have adopted sound statistical approaches for examining individual responses to exercise training. We also (1) investigated the existence of interindividual differences in trainability, and (2) tested the hypothesis that less conservative thresholds inflate response rates compared with thresholds that consider error and a smallest worthwhile change (SWC)/minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Methods: We searched six databases: AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and SportDiscus. Our search spanned the aerobic, resistance, and clinical or rehabilitation training literature. Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, and either: (1) stated that their exercise training intervention resulted in heterogenous responses, (2) statistically estimated interindividual differences in trainability, and/or (3) classified individual responses. We calculated effect sizes (ES Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2021 Bonafiglia, Preobrazenski and Gurd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |