The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match.

Autor:	Taparra K; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.; Transitional Year Residency Program, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin., Ebner DK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Cruz D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas., Holliday EB; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Advances in radiation oncology [Adv Radiat Oncol] 2022 Jan-Feb; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 100842. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 29.
DOI:	10.1016/j.adro.2021.100842
Abstrakt:	Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic modified the Residency Match process for fourth-year medical students. In-person away rotations were discouraged, interviews were virtual, and traditional factors used to rank programs were absent. Here, we compare survey results administered to both the 2020 and 2021 Match applicants to assess the influence of the pandemic on the radiation oncology (RO) Match process. Methods: An institutional review board-approved prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The 2020 and 2021 RO Match applicants at a large RO program were invited to participate. Descriptive summary statistics were assessed. Results: The 2020 and 2021 Matches each had 76 applicants complete the survey with response rates of 54% and 57%, respectively. The 2 groups were predominantly white, cisgender male, single, and without children. Whereas 11% of 2020 applicants did not complete away rotations, 45% of 2021 applicants did not. For 2021 Match applicants, 65% of away rotations were performed virtually, whereas 51% were not for medical school credit. Of the applicants, 84% were satisfied with virtual interviews and 72% felt cost savings were worth not having in-person interviews. Whereas 49% of Match 2020 applicants spent >$5000 in interview costs, 0% of the Match 2021 applicants did so, with 45% spending <$100. Postinterview communications from programs increased during the pandemic from 36% to 42% in 2020 Match and 2021 Match, respectively. Although program culture was the most common factor influencing 2021 Match applicants program rankings, half of applicants did not gain a sense of program culture during virtual interviews. Conclusions: We found 2021 Match applicants completed fewer away rotations, were satisfied with virtual interviews/reduced costs, and did not gain a sense of program culture through virtual rotations/interviews despite it being the most important ranking factor reported. This study supports further exploration of virtual away rotations and virtual interviews moving forward beyond the pandemic. (© 2021 The Authors.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu