The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.
Autor: | Galla SJ; Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA.; School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand., Brown L; New Zealand Department of Conservation, Twizel, Canterbury, New Zealand., Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae Y; Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Te Whare o Te Waipounamu, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand., Cubrinovska I; School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand., Eason D; New Zealand Department of Conservation, Invercargill, Southland, New Zealand., Gooley RM; Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, Front Royal, Maryland, USA.; Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, District of Columbia, USA., Hamilton JA; Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA., Heath JA; Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA., Hauser SS; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA., Latch EK; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA., Matocq MD; Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA., Richardson A; The Isaac Conservation and Wildlife Trust, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand., Wold JR; School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand., Hogg CJ; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia., Santure AW; School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand., Steeves TE; School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Molecular ecology [Mol Ecol] 2022 Jan; Vol. 31 (1), pp. 41-54. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 22. |
DOI: | 10.1111/mec.16192 |
Abstrakt: | Over the past 50 years conservation genetics has developed a substantive toolbox to inform species management. One of the most long-standing tools available to manage genetics-the pedigree-has been widely used to characterize diversity and maximize evolutionary potential in threatened populations. Now, with the ability to use high throughput sequencing to estimate relatedness, inbreeding, and genome-wide functional diversity, some have asked whether it is warranted for conservation biologists to continue collecting and collating pedigrees for species management. In this perspective, we argue that pedigrees remain a relevant tool, and when combined with genomic data, create an invaluable resource for conservation genomic management. Genomic data can address pedigree pitfalls (e.g., founder relatedness, missing data, uncertainty), and in return robust pedigrees allow for more nuanced research design, including well-informed sampling strategies and quantitative analyses (e.g., heritability, linkage) to better inform genomic inquiry. We further contend that building and maintaining pedigrees provides an opportunity to strengthen trusted relationships among conservation researchers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities. (© 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |