Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals.
| Autor: | Hong BA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8134, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093, USA. hongb@wustl.edu., Cash ED; University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA., Cubic BA; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA., Wedding D; Saybrook University, Pasadena, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings [J Clin Psychol Med Settings] 2021 Dec; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 659-665. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 18. |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0 |
| Abstrakt: | Being a reviewer is an honor and it continues to be a very rewarding experience throughout a career. Reviewers get the opportunity to maintain scientific standards and assist in growing the scientific psychological literature. Being a reviewer enhances and integrates scientific values and clinical skills following the scientist-practitioner model. However, for the inexperienced reviewer, the experience can be very scary and intimidating. Everyone's experience with reviewing is highly personal and at the same time, the activity is both common and universal for academic psychologists. In this interview article, three seasoned reviewers respond to questions about their experience as journal reviewers reflecting in their answers their collective wisdom and knowledge in this area. (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|