G-spot: Fact or Fiction?: A Systematic Review.

Autor:	Vieira-Baptista P; Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal; Lower Genital Tract Unit, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal; LAP, a Unilabs Company, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: pedrovieirabaptista@gmail.com., Lima-Silva J; Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal; Lower Genital Tract Unit, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal., Preti M; Department of Surgical Sciences University of Torino, Torino, Italy., Xavier J; Gynecology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal., Vendeira P; Urology Department, Saúde Atlântica - Clínica do Dragão, Porto, Portugal., Stockdale CK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Sexual medicine [Sex Med] 2021 Oct; Vol. 9 (5), pp. 100435. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 09.
DOI:	10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100435
Abstrakt:	Introduction: The G-spot, a putative erogenous area in the anterior vaginal wall, is a widely accepted concept in the mainstream media, but controversial in medical literature. Aim: Review of the scientific data concerning the existence, location, and size of the G-spot. Methods: Search on Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar from inception to November 2020 of studies on G-spot's existence, location and nature. Surveys, clinical, physiological, imaging, histological and anatomic studies were included. Main Outcome Measure: Existence, location, and nature of the G-spot. Results: In total, 31 eligible studies were identified: 6 surveys, 5 clinical, 1 neurophysiological, 9 imaging, 8 histological/anatomical, and 2 combined clinical and histological. Most women (62.9%) reported having a G-spot and it was identified in most clinical studies (55.4% of women); in 2 studies it was not identified in any women. Imaging studies had contradictory results in terms of its existence and nature. Some showed a descending of the anterior vaginal wall, that led to the concept of clitourethrovaginal complex. In anatomic studies, one author could systematically identify the G-spot, while another group did not find it. Studies on innervation of the vaginal walls did not systematically identify an area with richer innervation. Conclusion: The different studies did systematically agree on the existence of the G-spot. Among the studies in which it was considered to exist, there was no agreement on its location, size, or nature. The existence of this structure remains unproved. Vieira-Baptista P, Lima-Silva J, Preti M, et al. G-spot: Fact or Fiction?: A Systematic Review. Sex Med 2021;9:100435. (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu