Comparison of specific and non-specific treatment approaches for individuals with posterior capsule tightness and shoulder impingement symptoms: A randomized controlled trial.

Autor: Rosa DP; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil., Borstad JD; Department of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN, USA., Ferreira JK; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil., Gava V; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil., Santos RV; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil., Camargo PR; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: prcamargo@ufscar.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Brazilian journal of physical therapy [Braz J Phys Ther] 2021 Sep-Oct; Vol. 25 (5), pp. 648-658. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 04.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.003
Abstrakt: Background: Posterior capsule tightness (PCT) is associated with shoulder pain and altered shoulder kinematics, range of motion (ROM), external rotation (ER) strength, and pain sensitization.
Objective: To assess the effects of two interventions on shoulder kinematics, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, ROM, strength, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in individuals with PCT and shoulder impingement symptoms.
Methods: In this prospectively registered randomized controlled trial 59 individuals were randomized to either an Experimental Intervention Group (EIG, n=31) or a Control Intervention Group (CIG, n=28). The low flexion (LF) test was used to determine the presence of PCT. Shoulder kinematics, SPADI scores, internal rotation (IR) and ER ROM, ER strength, and PPT were measured pre- and post-treatment. Those in the EIG received an intervention specific to pain and PCT and those in the CIG received a non-specific intervention, both 4 weeks in duration.
Results: Individuals in the EIG demonstrated more scapular upward rotation (P=.03; mean difference (MD)=3.3°; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.3°, 4.9°) and improved value on the LF test (P=.02; MD=4.6°; 95%CI=0.7°, 8.6°) than those in the CIG after treatment. Both groups presented less anterior (P<.01; MD=-0.7mm; 95%CI=-1.3mm, -0.2mm) and superior (P<.01; MD=-0.5mm; 95%CI=-0.9mm, -0.2mm) humeral translations, decreased SPADI score (P<.01; MD=-23.6; 95%CI=-28.7, -18.4), increased IR ROM (P<.01; MD=4.6°; 95%CI=1.8°, 7.8°) and PPTs for upper trapezius (P<.01; MD=60.1kPa; 95%CI=29.3kPa, 90.9kPa), infraspinatus (P=.04; MD=47.3kPa; 95%CI=2.1kPa, 92.5kPa), supraspinatus (P<.01; MD=63.7kPa; 95%CI=29.6kPa, 97.9kPa), and deltoid (P<.01; MD=40.9kPa; 95%CI=12.3kPa, 69.4kPa) after treatment.
Conclusion: The experimental intervention was more effective at improving PCT as measured through changes in the LF test. No benefit of the specific approach over the non-specific intervention was noted for the remaining variables.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest to disclosure
(Copyright © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: