A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G.
Autor: | Jeyaventhan R; Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK., Gallen G; Department of Diabetes, King's College Hospital, London, UK.; Institute of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity, King's Health Partners, London, UK., Choudhary P; Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.; Department of Diabetes, King's College Hospital, London, UK.; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK., Hussain S; Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.; Institute of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity, King's Health Partners, London, UK.; Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Diabetes, obesity & metabolism [Diabetes Obes Metab] 2021 Aug; Vol. 23 (8), pp. 1989-1994. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 09. |
DOI: | 10.1111/dom.14439 |
Abstrakt: | We report a real-world evaluation of the first commercially approved automated insulin delivery (AID) system, MiniMed 670G (670G), and open source-automated insulin delivery (OS-AID) systems. This was undertaken as a retrospective observational study in adults with type 1 diabetes using AID systems for 6 months or longer in a publicly funded health service using clinically validated data. Sixty-eight adults (38 670G, 30 OS-AID systems) were included. OS-AID system users were younger, had a shorter diabetes duration and a higher education status. OS-AID systems displayed a significantly better change in HbA1c (median -0.9% [-0.4%, -1.1%] vs. -0.1% [IQR -0.7%, 0.2%], P = .004) and time in range 3.9-10 mmol/L (mean 78.5%, SD ± 12.0% vs. 68.2% ± 14.7%, P = .024) compared with 670G. Both systems showed minimal hypoglycaemia, with OS-AID systems revealing significantly improved secondary outcomes of mean glucose and percentage of time more than 10 mmol/L, with a higher percentage of time of less than 3 mmol/L. OS-AID system users displayed improved glycaemic outcomes with no clinical safety concerns compared with 670G, although higher weight-adjusted insulin dose and weight gain were noted. The study highlights key differences in OS-AID system user characteristics that are important for interpreting real-world findings from recent OS-AID system studies. (© 2021 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |