Conscience clauses in genetic counseling: Awareness and attitudes.

Autor: Bonine S; Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD, USA., Bell M; Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD, USA., Fishler K; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA., Berninger T; Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA., Erickson L; Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of genetic counseling [J Genet Couns] 2021 Oct; Vol. 30 (5), pp. 1468-1479. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 08.
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1414
Abstrakt: Conscience clauses are laws that allow healthcare providers to refuse to participate in legal medical services based on moral or ethical objections. Genetic counselors encounter a variety of ethical and moral issues, including counseling about abortions. Currently, three states (Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Virginia) have genetic counseling conscience clause laws that allow genetic counselors to refuse to counsel about abortions. Conscience clause laws applying to physicians and pharmacists have been studied; however, they have not been studied in genetic counseling to date. We conducted an exploratory study assessing conscience clause awareness, attitudes, perceived obligations if utilizing a conscience clause, and alignment with the National Society of Genetic Counseling (NSGC) Code of Ethics. Genetic counselors (n = 274) currently practicing in the United States completed an online survey recruited through the NSGC listserv. The majority of participants were not aware that conscience clauses exist for genetic counseling (90%). There was uncertainty about whether genetic counselors had the right to utilize a conscience clause in practice (24% said yes, 31% said no, and 45% were unsure/needed more information). The majority reported an obligation to refer a patient if implementing a conscience clause (90%), although there were discrepancies among what constitutes an appropriate referral. When asked about the interaction between conscience clauses and the NSGC Code of Ethics, 45% believe they are separate and one does not supersede the other, 31% felt the Code of Ethics supersedes, 8% felt conscience clauses supersede, and 16% were unsure. Our study shows overall uncertainty with how conscience clause laws may be applied in clinical practice. Further clarity and education, especially in states where these laws exist, is critical to navigate the interaction between conscience clause laws and genetic counseling practice.
(© 2021 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: